Overmanning in social workers

Overmanning in social workers


To obvious abuse of placements of children by social abuse, the Council of Europe has published a standard booklet "rights of children and at risk." There is found essentially that children should grow up in their families, a reminder to the principle of subsidiarity, which hold us dear and which the State cannot interfere in our life than absolute need to if. The conclusions of the Council of Europe are that even in these cases of necessity, the public authorities should implement the appropriate aid and not systematically resort to investments.

Let us be lucid, it is not necessary that families are aware of real problems so that interference is observed. It must be that officials of the social misery can work! They would therefore not hesitate to take office or malicious information for any abuse which the definition is extended to the extreme from the educator baffe to harassment to the duties of parents. Of course there are real cases of abuse where rapid intervention is essential, but social abuse professionals are unable to manage abuse organized in risk environments.

There are actually more simple situations and exposing them less. These situations led them with impunity to put 40 000 children in France for unjustified reasons. This is more than 10 years that the Inspectorate General of Social Affairs refers to this situation in its reports and that face-to-face social abuse unions put forward this precautionary principle rogue who would that doubt benefits investments.

Judicial proceedings take precedence over administrative procedures. And even these administrative procedures degenerate into judicial proceedings to the goodwill of social workers from which parents do not fairly quickly began to knees. Indeed, it is completely bewildering to see respectable parents to humiliate before some idiotic prying and authoritarian whose powers usurped in our society they sound like a social revenge for these ignored intelligence.

Once they have raised the infernal gear and sent their investigations to support on the basis of the risk any justified it, then the courts are seized in emergency and instruct on the only evidence to support. The outcome is the placement of the child in foster care or a measure of educational in an open environment (AEMO) assistance, in both cases the child is assumed in grave danger, so parents are regarded as unworthy! Thus to 40 000 children without justification can add the same number in family home or under freedom monitored in a "trusted third party" or in the family. It then reached the figure of at least 100,000 parents considered wrongly as unworthy!

The moral cost of such measures is impossible to quantify: depression, suicide, futures marred for children.

It is easier to encrypt the financial cost and identify recipients. So according to the association for the defence of children, the "wire of Ariane", the child in danger reporting procedure costs 5,000 euros in legal costs, as earned for judges. Placement which follows cost EUR 1 500 per month and child so much money earned in the business of host families to the community, or even double the 3,000 euros for a home placement, it is the business of educators (updated figures from the report of the Board of economic analysis by Evelyne Sullerot and Michel Godet in 2001).

We begin to better understand the interest of the abusive placements. How many position of educators, social workers would be deleted without them? And that would then become this plethora of employees much cannot hope better than a conversion in telephone marketing?

To go further: http://Asso-cedif.e-monsite.com/