Parodies of Justices to the Court of appeal of Versailles and justice for children

Should we laugh or cry when seen on the order made by the Court of appeal of Versailles, the name of Ms. Delpy representing the ASE de Rambouillet and Mr Echappe were not present, ASE it is represented by Maitre Gracia counsel.

When it is shown also to counsel DUT and President mail which is not disputed the authenticity of the email, or judge for children have of hear us within 8 days, the conclusions we have made 45 pages, highlight violations of sections: "6; 8;" "and 12 of the international human rights Convention", as well as violations of section 375-7 - 8 of the Civil Code, attaching photos of our children and of course this abuse this returns against us.





Always at the level of the Court of appeal of Versailles, but this time above the President Mr De Becdelièbvre and Mr Echappe were not present hearing of 17/12/10. How much are they paid to make decisions without taking into account the folder discharge of parts of the defence. The worst is that the person who represents the Public Ministry said strangely this: "I know Mr Lorentz that you have the 3 RD year of rights, but we are not at school to make the rights", Mr Lorentz replied: "we are in a Court of Justice Mr, and the fact again, including defence."








Should we laugh or cry allegations of social services, indeed they says that if we did have our children WE for the months of October and November 2009, this is because parents have refused to take their children. Off we provided them a medical as what I was in rehabilitation for my legs and long journeys are banned me. We had a denial of their, suddenly we immediately alerted our lawyer Me Alexis of is that what was going on, and it it is in relation to the legal service of the General Council, which has allowed a 1 er time that they would be required for children are us by car. We waited from 17 a.m. kids outside because Mr. Alexis told us that the children would be by car. At 18 seeing H10 that our children were still not arrived, we returned to prevent our lawyer. She told us she arrived at her Office, and then she reminded us. Therefore, 19 a.m., our lawyer we recall, telling us that they had waited the closure of the offices for him sent a fax stating that it was Mr Lorentz allé seek only 6 children (who at the time of 9 years to 1 year ½, the last was buggy), how AHS could insured children safety in transport? Or then he allegedly took two taxis, but at more than 19 a.m. Rambouillet family Placement was closed.



Still a claim on the part of social services, in order to be justified in terms of justice, they were invented: ' mother would hand referred to a background of violence, Mr Lorentz. "

It is very strange because I've never held such remarks, and the most serious is that SEFCA PUTEAUX President talks about domestic violence and is in connection with associations dealing is problem. It is to die of laughter (MOR).

We are watches to our children, since the ESA stipulates that Louis was doing better since the accommodations, Christophe was mollified; Clara was more anxious, and Claire was in a perpetual cleavage between her foster family and parents, but as it evolved. Are extremely serious allegations of share social services in our regard, support course by former Justice of children.





I turn now to the health of Christophe; Charles and Clara, the ASE sign permissions of care relating to Christophe and Charles, certifications that we have never received both by Social Services to Christophe, Charles we've sent immediately leave him to an MRI by fax, and until today we have nothing to Christophe and Charles reviews at our place. The more serious it is Clara because they try by all means make past for a dingue, and asked the MDPH (House Department of persons with disabilities) in order to obtain an individual AVS. At that time Me Alexis told us especially not sign or fill this, and she did a mail in this sense.












Below mail the MDPH regarding Clara, received these days. Should be laughing or crying? See you even, which is surrounded on this mail. As new children judge knows that we have before the European Court of human rights, and well, let us pay it a downright extend 2 years the plight of our children.Moral of the story, they want us to silence, threatening that they should be prosecuted. My husband makes law excludes is kind of attitude on the part of judges. They should all past in corrections for abuse on our children under 15 years (physical and moral violence). We also publish school notes of Clara, without forgotten photos of our children when WE at home.





Photos on these photos, you can found the violence that I suffered on the part of my husband. BEWARE THE TENDERNESS OF A HUSBAND TOWARD HIS WIFE IS A CRIME, JUST LIKE FUSIONAL BE.



















Below you can see that Clara and Christophe are very disturbed; that Louis is stressed. It is true that they are not happy to be home.









History EXPERTISATION of an infant of 8 days per judge Mrs. GUIRAUD children, the EXPERTISATION should be made by OLGA SPITZER ASSOCIATION. NOT YOU REVEZ DOES NOT, AND YOU ARE NOT CRAZY.