dimanche 29 avril 2012

Undue investments, a scandal that is talked about more and more

Undue investments, a scandal that is talked about more and more
26/09/2010 at 19: 38 - last updated 28/09/2010 at 16: 38. 5458 views. 8
If there is a French tradition well anchored in the population is the practice of the information. It is certainly blame there envy, a bad penchant of the soul franchouillarde encouraged by our institutions and our media.
What neighbors eat butter, they have coffee! Exclaims mother Frachon, it is sure they are of the black market and what happens to them it is well made, rajoutera it by sending his anonymous letter to the Kommandantur.
You know those who have a piano, I am sure that it is Jewish, there is no us a piano, it will tell that law, threatens father Lopez.
No more the Kommandantur that the tax authorities or social services are too much detail, there is no smoke without fire and be well justified its staff activity.
But the worst is taking on the blood rather than money. The fortune it gets, not the family. Or Kommandantur, Stasi or KGB the prolific informant, jealous of success or happiness of his neighbour, will swing to social services for children.
Certainly not tokens stone to all officials of the administration of social assistance to children (ASE), where among them they are a few honest and dedicated to the cause of our light heads in distress they will not hesitate to come forward to help us. But for the moment none responded to the appeal. Doing not too hasty conclusions, let us to the facts because they are Afar, dixit Lenin, to speak in a language they understand.
The facts in this case are that following slander or a misunderstood, or even already resolved situation, one child in two is an abusive home placement.
Yes, a child on two! In other words, a dad and a MOM on two cannot meet their children under supervision of custody-chiourmes that once a month without that they are the least dangerous world for their offspring. The question then arises whether how this abnormal relationship is experienced by one and the other. In General, confident of their good right personal to child welfare and stipendiées associations watch with suspicion parents, and to best treat them as for major incapable persons.
This attitude is quite disastrous for their children who come to fear and think that they were removed because of their parents. And indeed, the young raptés are conditioned to integrate that their situation arises from the abnormality of the parental home, while a contrario their home situation is fully justified.
It is necessary for social abuse that the child reasons so. Otherwise the child could not accept the situation him and become a source of inconvenience.
Now how can respond these parents who to blame such a situation? The answer to this question is not so complicated as you who read me, you certainly live in a family that was not separated, you not suffer nor do suffer abuse in the sense where you don't put at risk your child's mental or physical health. You can put you in this fringe of parents to the development of your children.
Then imagine that you placed in the crosshairs of a well established in social abuse, genus FSU trade union organisation, that your marital happiness bothers some, that the good results of the children and their ability to work concerned the thinking assets of egalitarianism.
Of course, you are not aware of what is happening in your back, until the day where ESA (new name of the DDASS) written to you and sends you a Bulldog in petticoat, or even a former activist of the Red brigades (it was), that invites you in you explaining that you are the object of educational assistance in an open environment.No panic yet, they will remove you your children, they come just implement freedom monitored under your own roof. The Bulldog in petticoat which should one day be a woman will explain, necessary before your children, that you are not good parents. She knows how it cares for the children, the evidence its own just insult your own school or making fun of them because they do not like rap and they too often take the floor in the classroom. Her children are normal not your own, be convinced. And also if you rechignez to the implementation of this measure, your children you will be taken to be properly packaged.
Imagine yourself in your living room a little too coquet for his taste, it looks everywhere without the air of tamper, cannot suppress a grimace when she sees books in English, even in Bulgarian to be confused with Russian, you seem to spread your elitism and return to its complexes. She fixed her eyes on a book tribute to Ronald Reagan, you have funny references think.
It is therefore concerned whether its intervention is perceived as it should.
In fact I don't know what there is in your library and if you left dragged a few numbers of humanity Sunday, it should be more smiling. Finally as a bulldog can be without stain your Persian of a flow of drooling.
I know not how you will respond to this aggression, you will perhaps paralysed, unable to say a Word, paralyzed by shock, fear of what might happen to your children. She mentally note all this, you are there to make your evidence of docility and resignation. You are there to crush you at home. You are not equal in law, you have let it enter forget all the constitutional principles. No, you are an accused that it does not prevent suspected of something that you don't know, the authority with her and you in serious trouble in perspective. Based on what it will be, the true or false expert psy (it was also) what will eat caviar and elements for his upcoming report.
You will likely feel your right foot itch you. You lutterez fervently against the drive hardly repressible of see this dirty woman by air to large pumps in the ass until your perron. A liberating drive and oh justified because of what right and criticize your educational mode?
So I don't know what you would have done, but I know how to respond to a friend then to the denunciation of a neighbour, you know one of those that are intended to be "progressive" and inspire confidence in Governments by their commitment in subsidized associations. I know that my friend was asked why he was a good father and his wife a good mother, was that as a result it is not required.
I know that he has criticized the French institution of social assistance to childhood by comparing it to its country of origin, a Communist country who knew how to standardize behaviour. My friend is is left standardize neither there nor here, he remained standing by maintaining her dignity of man and father, this is social abuse broke him his family.
Yes all it because he continues to believe that the family is the ideal place for children's development. To believe and say, it will be considered paranoid and unfit to family life as long as he has not abandoned "to its convictions and certainties".
My friend should have health care to abandon such convictions, he did not and it weigh in the balance. EH Yes, social abuse our beliefs to treat, it's called the rehabilitation seems to me. Indeed there are camps for this, in France called homes. Or re-educate the father, these are children that will be placed in the home, then in deserving families in the eyes of the State. This investment will last as long the father will not be his self-criticism to social abuse, hated associative allies and his own children, as it said no family or personal difficulties Yes it is written black on white, I not making this up.
It will be even alleged the father talking to his son of the media coverage of this case and undermine belief established in his child that this is happening would be to his property. This legitimate will to act to maintain the confidence and the ability of his son to understand the lived drama, social abuse will punish the father of an additional sentence of one year of remoteness and describe his act "of inability to comply with the framework referred to preserve her children". I am sorry not to provide both registered laughter this situation is dramatic.
This happens in the France of public abuse in 2010 and if there is more enough children to keep employment at the ESA and satellite associations, if you enjoy to your progressive neighbors, if you do not recognize that your children belong to the community social before belong to your family if you are not ready to you humiliate before social parasites then soon it is your family they will destroy.
Langue source
Cela se passe bien dans la France des sévices publics en 2010 et si il n’y a plus assez d’enfants pour maintenir l’emploi à l’ASE et dans les associations satellites, si vous ne plaisez pas à vos voisins progressistes, si vous ne reconnaissez pas que vos enfants appartiennent à la collectivité sociale avant d’appartenir à votre famille, si vous n’êtes pas prêts à vous humilier devant des parasites sociaux alors bientôt c’est votre famille qu’ils détruiront.

Aucun commentaire:

Enregistrer un commentaire

info Benjamin et de son fils Aureo (sefca puteaux solidaire du papa)

Cédric Fleurigeon http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=264268448591 Nous demandons à tous pendant une journée, le samedi 30 janvier 2010 de changer la photo de votre profil par celle de Benjamin et de son fils Aureo Il serait bon de voir fleurir cette photo sur la toile que se soit sur Facebook, MySpace, MSN ainsi que sur tous les méd