Citizenship, freedom, psychiatry!

' Citizenship, freedom, Psychiatry: Declaration of entry into resistance ".
Here is an application for entry into resistance against the new law "citizenship, freedom, Psychiatry: Declaration of entry into resistance". This request is justified as you will see by reading the section below. A number of psychiatrists are insurgents against this law but make no mistake, the psychiatrists are misleading and veules and if they pretend to be against this Act is for the sole reason that if they said that they are for, they would simply be lynched.
Those who have already had these individuals case have noted how they were treacherous and gifted in how to fool the world.

The France has 13500 psychiatrists, how it protestés against this law? They are much too content these "soul doctors" of this Act who sat their powers.

There is a very interesting book showing how to recognize the people that surround us. I named it "the book banned psychiatrists".

The Webmaster

' Citizenship, freedom, Psychiatry: Declaration of entry into resistance ".

August 1, 2011, of the collective statement "but it's a man":
The Act of July 5, 2011 on "rights and the protection of persons subject to psychiatric care and their terms of support" and its application orders come into force. The strong movement against this law can and should continue after its enactment.
This Act-in the same vein that those aliens, immigration, recidivism, the retention of security, the juvenile justice, homeland security, etc. - involved the considerable abuse of freedoms and social rights. It organizes [1] the social monitoring of the vulnerable and precarious stigmatized in 'dangerous classes '. ». The example of the display of any troublemaker disorder and bad student potential, it opens even a "psychiatric record" of the "mentally ill", without real "right to oblivion".
This Act is fundamentally unacceptable because it imposes hardship and social control such as organization of care in Psychiatry at the hospital to the home, under the new appellation aberrant care without consentement. The caregiver position in its relational quality is degraded in "expertise of dangerousness", which exacerbates the current situation of mental suffering and disillusionment in many teams, with result to amplify the meaning of home care errors.
The "entry" into observation and care will now by a 72-hour psychiatric custody, without even the grubbed up guarantees recently in the case of custody at police view.

Contemporary Psychiatry questioned significantly large withdrawal. Struggle organized by professionals, users, human rights activists have obtained development rights and questioned the legitimacy of the confinement and the status of exception of the "crazy".
We do not accept that Psychiatry and mental health are embrigadées as part of the policies of the company. We reject the politics of fear.
Making of any debate on the right and the duty of care work on the mode of refusal or treatment to à sur sur sur de de tout débat sur l' obligation de soin et le droit fonctionner sur le mode du refus ou traitement à sur le à du à the to à du à du du à à à à le à du à and run de de tout débat sur l' obligation de soin et le droit fonctionner sur le mode du refus ou traitement à sur le à du à et fonctionner le fonctionner le work ou function faisant de de tout débat sur l' obligation de soin et le droit fonctionner sur le mode du refus ou traitement à sur le à du à et fonctionner le fonctionner ou fonctionner fonctionner function We condemn the hypocrisy of the legislature and the deception of the Act: a real psychological care cannot be conceived without the consent.
At this repulsive guidance given psychiatric care to tools with along with the effects and consequences of entrepreneurial logic and the case of public service. We reject the type of additional means attributed after the speech of December 2008 Antony to "secure". We demand orientation and ways which are boosting the Psychiatry of sector, provide and foster practices based on the ethics of complexity, to take care of home, hospitality, the role of the third social and family support, of a real rehabilitation, etc.

To form contours and content, we are in favour of a national debate which the object is:
● the repeal of the Act of 27 June 1990 and July 5, 2011. the repeal of the Act of 27 June 1990 and that of July 5, 2011. The need for a law that finish with the psychiatric exception and which belongs to the well designed psychological care articulated to the ordinary law: i.e. the authorization and control of the civil judge.
● la mise en chantier d’une loi programmatique pour une psychiatrie démocratique dont l’objet et l’éthique sont proposés dans notre manifeste initial, qui soit à l’opposé des gouvernances de mise au pas gestionnaire dont sont représentatifs les plans de santé mentale actuels et annoncés.

We need to discuss, but we must also act. We must respect the laws if they same respect law, in this case the intimacy of private life and individual freedoms. The Act, which in the tradition is liberating, now is an instrument of social control. It formate, orders and certificates to support. The tradition of civil disobedience, it since 1789 to oppose laws, but it is now also fight the law by the law. The slavish application of the Act would create not only the injustice or psychiatric aberration; It would be illegal. The Act is that of a situational majority, but the right, built in time, is the work of all. Where are we going? What is not written, and only the radicality of the analysis to extricate models adjusted, already prepared to bury us.
In the immediate future and that date from August 1 to mark the entry into force of the Act, we propose a plan of action and ethical resistance:
-the refusal of the psychiatrists and caregivers, to the extent possible, to implement the measures of constraint. And including, the refusal of the caregivers collectives of all program "forced to care" home contrary to ethics and human rights. Similarly, must refuse any medical advice without being able to examine the patient.
-the systematic seizure of the judge of freedoms, the patient must be heard out of visio-Conference.
-develop information, especially in 72 hours, so that people do not fall into the psychiatric trap that this law, but access to mental health care to which they are entitled.
-support of the appeal and defences of patients subjected to these "care without consent", including the QPC that will fail to occur. The creation of a group of lawyers and Jurists will be essential in this sense.
-the construction of a national observatory to monitor the implementation of this Act which provides data collection, the alert on the rights of persons subject to the "care without consent", as relates to Parliament, to the controller of the freedoms and places of detention, to the National Advisory Commission for the rights of man and to the public the rights of man and the ethics of psychological care.
We are and will continue to be mobilized to achieve a work of democracy and professionnalités.