AFTER THE VERDICT AGAINST YVAN COLONNA

COMMITTEE FOR SUPPORT OF CARGÈSE.

(Jean-Hugues COLONNA Takladia 20130 Cargèse / Jean-Hugues.Colonna@orange.fr / 04 95 26 46 57.)



AFTER THE VERDICT AGAINST YVAN COLONNA

ANGER AND DETERMINATION



In the aftermath of the verdict which condemns Yvan Colonna to life imprisonment, many feel seized by anger and indignation... And sympathy for the parents, wife, son...

Some of the comments say "the Court was not satisfied by...". This suggests that it could have been. Everything is working normally in the best of worlds sarkozystes.

Stéphane Durand-/ H, the chronicler of the Figaro is much more circumspect when referring to this "letter" of threats Yvan Colonna would have written to Alessandri, he concludes: it "proves nothing but creates discomfort because it strengthens the impressiona underground torrent thunders under the feet of the Court and toother control dykes". It is said: on the independence and the serenity of justice on the separation of Executive and judicial powers.

Why these liberticidal excesses? If it is optimistic, it will be recalled almost the inability of judges and police officers to recognize that they are mistaken. In the anti-terrorism sphere is clearly preferred the forfaiture to the defence of the truth.

If one is pessimistic is asked what interests lead the Executive and the justice to oppose any research in a clearly forbidden direction. One of these accomplices and designers of the attack which all demonstrate. What network he wanted the removal of the prefect, faithful servant of the Act, opposed to illicit but lucrative projects? It never will know?



THE MOTIVATIONS OF THE VERDICT

It requires looking at the reasons expressed by the Court "specially composed" of professional judges (appointed by the authority) to justify imprisonment.

Many are simply peremptory. Thus it is said that Y.V. was "obvious" part of the anonymous group. It is a contention free and contrary to most of the facts.

Others are genuine denial of reality. We are told that the charges against Yvan are "precise, detailed and consistent". In fact, they are so contradictory that they cancel out themselves. Example: Jeanne Ferrandi says that Y.C. is at it (Ajaccio) Friday night 6 February 98 to Saturday noon while the Maranelli woman shown in it (in Cargèse) on Saturday morning at 7: 30. The Court said that, in preparing his escape, Y.C. lifted 30,000 F to its Bank of Cargèse Friday, May 21, 99. He said that 24 000 F for the restaurant of his companion and 6000 F for work done at home. Gold was found by the 6000 F in his house. And, on the other hand, everyone knows that withdraw a large sum to the Bank to prevent 48 hours in advance. May 19, nobody knew that the commando would be arrested the 21. As alibis to Y.C. they are confirmed by his family, and all the other witnesses.

Finally, the fills. This third trial has made a very credible scenario that explains the charges, maintaining them long and often ambiguous retraction: Y.C. commando was punished because he had refused to participate in the attack and on the suspicion that has weighed on him to have been the informer of the prefect Bonnet. To remove this critical information, the Court has recourse to an incredible argument: Y.C. said that he had refused to include the anonymous group? The jury blamed of having no "plausible explanation" for this refusal. It would therefore now give "plausible" justifications when it refuses to commit a crime!

THE RUN

Commando Erignac was arrested for the most part Friday 21 May 99 from 6 o'clock in the morning. In Cargèse, as early as the middle of the morning, everyone is aware. Y.C., he continues normally go about his business: deals with goats, cheese making, tour the brocciu, etc. As a man who has nothing to be blamed? Error! The Court explains that it "simulates". These judges have the gift of second sight. Without comment.

But since the run plays a privileged role in the fantasies on guilt, we stop a moment on this point.

Usually a culprit who wants to escape justice fled postpone all other cases as soon as he thought to be in danger of arrest. And he ran as far as possible, most of the time in a country where extradition procedures do not exist. As Y.C., this strange "runner"? It does not detract from its habits; at noon it lunch with his parents. In the afternoon, he goes to the Bank; in the evening, he related his goats; the next day, same program; joined by a team of TF1, he agrees to meet an interview Saturday night; It will eat a pizza with journalists, then; their announced his departure to the goats the next morning at the lights (he was found wandering cattle.) He and his partner, Alex, there were alternately every 15 days. (It was easy to verify). The judges provide no particular reason that it went on the run at the time there while he says that he does fled that 26 after France-evening reading that headline on any page, above his picture, "Wanted, prefect killer". 23 Or 26, this does not change the substance of things: Y.C. is not party immediately. 24, It launches an international warrant against him. Without that we know whether or not he fled. On Monday, so no one can ensure that it is on the run. Why, then, has it not sent police officers to his research?

It is known, that subsequently, he refused to be exfiltré by the group that helped him hide.

AND NOW...

If the guilt of Y.V. was so obvious, why the Court to give so hard to scroll as much free statements and censor all truths? It comes back to the editor of le Figaro. It is clear that this is a totally disingenuous to meet construction these "others that require the dikes". Hard against Y.C. want to luxuriate or obedience to that stated on the evening of July 4, 2003, "the French police comes to stop the assassin of prefect Erignac, Yvan Colonna". Contrary to the presumption of innocence. The fundamental problem is that the separation of powers. But it won't change of President in 2012 so that these problems are addressed. It is an old French that imposing forced or voluntary of many judges to political power. Yvan Colonna is sentenced a third time by the will of the political power and we are all defeated him. It is therefore of the view should now carry out most of the combat field. The need to appeal to all the good wishes and the voices. Need to federate all energies wherever they come. Cases like this are the responsibility of all. Much time has already passed (8 years in prison for nothing!) but can still be won.

(Text from the blog of writer Roland LAURETTE in Mediapart)