LIKE A Mr magistrate

LIKE A Mr magistrate

1.Formal admissibility to articles 1-1031, 1031-2 of the code of civil procedure

2. THE EXTINCTION OF THE INSTANCE BY FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE TIME LIMITS

This character of the lapse is explained in procedural law by the idea of sanction152 (**).

3.The consistency of the interpretation of the texts governing the magistrate occupation

In State. It is up to the parties to the proceedings at the forms and deadlines, and it is therefore logical that the sanction of such guidelines is of public order. This command is indeed often the power and even the duty of the judge to raise Office this way.

The lapse, appears in private law, most often as an instrument for the protection of the general interest linked to the proper functioning of the public service of justice; in other rare cases it tends to protect a part of the manoeuvres of his adversaire154

4 Admissibility under article l. 441 - 1 of the code of judicial organization 5. Judicial denial of justicePoursuite denial of justice guilty judges: civil code, art. 4 art. 366 9

Obligation on the State to repair the damage caused by the defective functioning of the service of (gross negligence and denial of justice) justice: the judicial organization code, art. L. 141-1 and s.

6. We ask according to section 341-4 of the civil procedure code and article 47 and article 97 of the code of civil procedure, the top time of our record, and challenge of the magistrate.

QPC articles 6 and 16 involving proceedings must be fair and equitable and ensure the balance of rights of the parties;

S. 61 1 Of the CONSTITUTION française, 1st paragraph

"When, on the occasion of a case pending before a court, it is argued that a legislative provision infringes the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution, the Constitutional Council can be seized of this question on reference of the Council of State or the Court of Cassation, which pronounces within a specified period.".

REMINDER

The duties of the magistrate and the oath

Set professional standards which is now applied to the magistrates, it is search that the exercise of the profession imposes as special ethical obligations being understood that outside these rules of criminal law and civil law, apply to the magistrate at the same of every citizen.

****

With regard to the rules of the civil law applied to the magistrate in the exercise of his judicial activity, it should be noted that civil liability may be sought in the action for recovery of the State whose responsibility would have been committed to subsequently

defective operation of the public service of justice, for detachable personal fault (article L.781-1 of the Code of judicial organization).

With regard to the rules of criminal law, they apply to the magistrate in the exercise of his activity in various cases, such corruption (article 434-9 of the penal Code) the denial of justice (article 434-7-1) the abuse of authority (section 432-1) the violation of professional secrecy (226-13) etc... For the rest, the Court of cassation made result from the constitutional principle of independence of the judges, the result that "their adjudicative decisions cannot be criticized, both in their reasons that in their".

"device, by the sole exercise of the remedies provided by law." that "this principle, that of deliberative secrecy are obstacle that a court decision may be considered as constituting in itself a crime or an offence", adding "it is same as the magistrate of the Prosecutor's Office.". Therefore that it is of principle that the Crown takes the requisitions and freely develops the observations that he believed adequate for the good of justice. »

****

Order n ° 58-1270 of 22 December 1958 change with the status of the Judiciary Organization Act defines the professional obligations of the magistrate of the four main provisions.

****

First article 6 contains the oath that any magistrate upon appointment to his 1st position and before: "I swear to well and faithfully perform my duties, to religiously maintain the secrecy of the deliberations of and lead me in as a worthy and loyal magistrate.".

** Next, article 10 provides that "any political deliberation is prohibited in the judiciary - all manifestations of hostility to the principle or the form of the Government of the Republic is"

prohibited magistrates, and any demonstration of political nature incompatible with the proviso that impose their function - is also impeding the functioning of the courts. »

*****

Then article 43 defines the disciplinary: "any breach by a magistrate to the duties of his State to the honour, delicacy or dignity, constitutes a disciplinary fault - this fault is assessed for a member of the Prosecutor's Office, a magistrate in the framework of the central administration of the Ministry of justice with the obligations flowing from the hierarchical subordination.".

****

By the decision of May 11, 2010, the Criminal Chamber recognizes that single infringement of the rights of the defence, in the case of the principle of equality of arms, is likely to lead to the nullity of the criminal procedure Article 6 of the European Convention of the rights of human - right to a fair trial

"1. Every person has a right to that his case be heard fairly, publicly and in a timely, by independent and impartial tribunal established by law, which will decide, or challenges on its rights and obligations of a civil nature, to the merits of any charge in criminal matters against it.". The judgment must be made publicly, but access to the courtroom may be barred to the press and to the public during all or part of the trial

In the interests of morals, public order or national security in a society

Democratic, where the interests of juveniles or the protection of the privacy of the parties to the trial so require, or to the extent deemed necessary by the Court, when in special circumstances the publicity would prejudice the interests of justice

In conclusion:

The specificity of the jurisdictional function has always imposed a particular plan of implementation of the responsibility of those who exercise it, and the State itself constitutes a sovereign power. Based on criminal punishment for denial of justice: criminal code, art. 434 7-1

Finally the article 79, paragraph 1, provides that "honorary magistrates are required to reserve that their condition."

Specific texts provide the incompatibilities and prohibit a magistrate to exercise national political mandates or the European Parliament or in a jurisdiction or the magistrate had five years before, a local term or when her spouse is parliamentary.

The magistrates of the judiciary could not escape to a general principle of civil liability. But the risk was great of a multiplication of their party by dissatisfied litigants. Disturbing the serenity of judges, such a threat had violated their statutory independence.

This is why a highly restrictive regime of liability was established by article 505 of the Code of civil procedure. There were two aspects:

-On the one hand, the possibility for individuals to put at stake the responsibility

Personal judges particularly drastic conditions. It was the procedure of taking part, very rarely applied, the rigour of the jurisprudence still accentuating of the Act.

-On the other hand, and correlatively, the State was liable of conviction in damages that might be pronounced against magistrates, except remedy against the third party liable. This rule was therefore only spending a vicarious liability regime

The disciplinary of Nanterre and judges of the Court of appeal of Versailles of the 7th special House of minors: Mrs. Armelle Guiraud. Ms. Martine Novella and Mr Pierre Pedron. Ms. Favereau; see the judgment of January 07, 2011 in the 7th House, or is not the person who delivered the judgment, but people who were not present on the day of the hearing to: Mrs.: fumble; and Becdelièvre; (article 43) is first defined without reference to the oath (section 6) which provides certain ethical obligations yet. The Higher Council of the judiciary, the Council of State on use

allow to apprehend in a casuistic way what is meant by duties of the State of the judiciary: "Honour;" Delicacy; "or dignity".

"The CCJE wishes to emphasize that the compelling need to preserve the independence of the judges assumed that when considering the drafting of a declaration of ethical standards, it is based on two essential principles:

(i) Firstly, it should refer to the fundamental principles of ethics and assert that it is impossible to draw up an exhaustive list of prohibited the judge behaviour which would be previously defined. the principles enacted should be instruments of self-control of the judges, i.e. General rules that are guides to action.

****

Also, although there is so much overlap that reciprocal effect, should the ethics remain independent of the system of discipline of judges, in the sense that the ignorance of one of these principles should not be in itself a cause of implementation set of disciplinary, civil or criminal liability; then the ethical principles should be the emanation of the judges themselves. they should be designed as an instrument of self-regulation of the body, generated by itself, allowing the judiciary,

To gain legitimacy by the exercise of functions under generally accepted ethical standards. "A broad consensus should be planned, possibly under the auspices of a person or a body referred to in paragraph 293, which could also have the task to explain and interpret the statement of principles of professional conduct".

France, the Higher Council of the judiciary launched a reflection towards the adoption of ethical standards. The last recommendation above is for the moment followed, since a consultation is launched in the profession, with designation of representatives of the judges in each court of appeal.

The judges have knowingly developed Parties at trial "custodial services", in a position of strength, to the detriment of another party, the parents.

In such conditions created by judges of the children Mrs Guiraud. Novella and Mr Pedron, debates can be impartial.

****

"It is fundamental that the judges of the children forget their roles of counterforce to the intervention of social services: their roles as guarantor of individual freedoms."

** The debates conducted only by judges of the children Mrs Guiraud, and Novella, and Mr Pedron, without the presence of the parents, and only the presence of social assistance to children at these hearings constitute A VIOLATION of the. IMPATIALITE is not respected article 388-1 of the civil code, neither meets the requirements of article 6 §1 of the European convention for protection of the rights of man and fundamental freedoms.

Article 6 - Right to a trial fair everyone has right to that his case be heard fairly, publicly and in a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law, which will decide, or challenges about its rights and obligations civil in nature, or the merits of any charge in criminal proceedings against it. The judgment must be made

publicly, but access to the courtroom may be barred to the press and to the public during all or part of the trial in the interests of morals, public order or national security in a democratic society, where the interests of juveniles or the protection of the privacy of the parties to the trial so require, or to the extent strictly required by the tribunalwhere in special circumstances the advertising would impair the interests of justice.

*****.

Any person charged with an offence is presumed innocent until his guilt has been legally established.

Any accused is entitled inter alia to:

Be informed, within the shortest time, in a language which he understands and in detail, the nature and the cause of the charge against him;

Have the time and facilities for the preparation of his defence;

defend himself or have the assistance of an advocate of his choice and, if he has no means of paying a defender, able to be assisted free of charge by a lawyer, when the interests of justice so require; query or question witnesses and to obtain the calling and interrogation of the defence witnesses under the same conditions as the witnesses

Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life

Any person is entitled to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence.

There may be interference by a public authority in the exercise of this right only to the extent that this interference is prescribed by the Act and that it constitutes a measure which, in a democratic society, is necessary to national security, public safety, to the economic well-being of the country, the defence of the order and the prevention of criminal offencesthe protection of health or morals, or the protection of the rights and freedoms of others

Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy

Any person whose rights and freedoms recognized in the present Convention have been violated, is entitled to an effective remedy before a national court, even though the infringement allegedly committed by persons acting in the exercise of their official duties

Such findings demonstrate the failures of the magistrates, and the denis thereof.

Article 29 - Decisions of the Chambers on the admissibility and the merits

If no decision was made under articles 27 or 28, or no decision under section 28, a house rule on the admissibility and the merits of the individual motions under section 34. The decision on admissibility may be considered separately.

****

A house rule on the admissibility and the merits of the State motions under section 33. Unless the Court in exceptional cases, the decision on admissibility is made separately.

****

Such methods of manipulation of children are filthy, and only a totally impartial magistrate of the parties.

For these reasons:

We undertake prosecutions for the following reasons:

(1) The criminally reprehensible behaviour that he has given rise to criminal prosecution.

(3) Breach or professional failure which give rise to delays taken by the judges in the performance of their missions through the use of their functions to private purposes, the behavior of a lack of impartiality.

The State professional failures present some serious, repeated, are of a disciplinary nature.

(4) I request that all orders are lifted.

(5) That all our children, we are made on the basis of Irecevabilite: "Clear;" Marie-Laure; Clara; Christophe; Charles; Louis; "Amélie and Christian Lorentz"

(6) We are asking that the leaders of the social assistance at Suresnes and Placement Rambouillet family child, be prosecuted for misappropriation of the truth, and manipulation in the same way as the Magistrates because it overrides their judgment.

(7) We are asking that each child who have been traumatized by this case, be compensated in the amount of EUR 150 000, by the State and EUR 60 000 for each child by the general Council of 92.

(8) - for the visa of articles 341 of the code of civil procedure and 6 § 1 of the Convention for the protection of the rights of man and fundamental freedoms, the finding of the causes for disqualification of judges and the invalidity of the decision of the latter for impartiality

(9) We ask that articles 47 and 97 of the civil procedure code, are respected.

(10) Articles 341-4 of the CPC; Västberga-1 of the code of judicial organization and article 226-13 for violation of professional secrecy, indeed the children Ms. Guiraud and Ms. Novella judges were disclosed on a site: "justice.cloppy.net", elements of the judicial record, (see the records to the public prosecutor of Nanterre).

(11) Articles 341-4 of the CPC; Västberga-1 of the code of judicial organization and article 226-13 for violation of professional secrecy, in effect the judges of the Court of appeal Ms. Favreau: Marie Gabrielle Magueur President

According to the Code of Civil Procedure: "as stated in section 75 of the Act No. 91-647 of 10 July 1991,"

REMINDER texts

. Under the terms of article 176 of the CPC, "any proceedings will be extinguished by discontinuation of prosecution for three years 168 (**). Paragraph 2 of the same text provides that "this time will be increased by 6 months in all cases where it will take place at request in continuance of instance169 (**)". Thus, when since the last act of procedure170 (**) it took more than three years, or in cases where there were held in continuance of suit demand, more than three years and 6 months, the instance is outdated and therefore extinct. However, so the lapse could actually play, a number of conditions must be met to allow its implementation.

Indeed, the lapsing of the Act is the result of a defect that's very generally of the failure to comply with a specification designed to speed up the course of the proceedings. In addition, and this is undoubtedly his characteristic, the lapse is objective; It operates normally right. This character of the lapse is explained in procedural law by the idea of sanction152 (**). The sunset appears indeed as the sanction of a lack of due diligence of the parties. It is up to the parties to the proceedings at the forms and deadlines, and it is therefore logical that the sanction of such guidelines is of public order. This command is indeed often the power and even the duty of the judge to raise Office this way

-the lack of referral to the Court within the statutory time limit; It's here the late placement assignment before the tribunal155 (**), or the statement of appeal to the Court of appel156 (**).

-the default appearance of the applicant; This defect causes the staleness of the citation to two conditions: the absence of justification by the applicant of a reason legitimate non-

Appearance, this justification for the judge to refer the matter to a later hearing. and the lack of judgment on the merits by comparing respondent; the

judge cannot rule on the merits at the request of the defendant and cannot proceed to office157 (**); In addition, if it is required to rule on the merits, the judge must give reasons for its decision and cannot confine itself to deny the applicant by the finding of the absence of comparution158 (**). This cause of lapse of the application is not in default of appearance of the applicant in case of appeal, the Court of cassation having decided upon that the failure of the appellant's appearance "is not sufficient to render null and void the statement of appeal" 159 (**); the Court of appeal must in this case, if the appellant was regularly summoned, that the appeal is not submitted and confirm the judgment;

-the failure of performance by the applicant of the acts of the procedure160 (**).

B / the extinction of the instance to null and void quote.

*****

72 Observes that the extinctive cause of the instance is the result each time a deficiency of the applicant, and non-parties. The latter before a Court of a dispute, but because of the non‑compliance of a formality required by law, in a time-limit for the proper conduct of the proceedings, his initial application is not taken into consideration. There is therefore a time for as a time to act. However, if this time escaped the applicant forced to bend to the measurement of time fixed by the law, the defendant is recognize an alternative. First branch of the alternative, the respondent wishes to terminate the instance to which it is party to that bad BRM, it is sufficient to apply to the judge the extinction to lapse. But the defendant may prefer to opt for the second branch of the alternative. He can not ask the judge to see the sunset or, and the result is the same, require a judgment on the merits, the judge having, in the latter case, than the faculty to refer the matter to a later hearing.

****

The binding of the instance at the initiative of the defendant is required to the judge, despite the lapse of the citation. There is therefore a kind of unilateral control of the referral by the defendeur161 (**).

The adopted text actually takes this requirement of gross negligence, coupled with the denial of justice (art.) L. 781-1, al. (1).

We are seeking compensation under article 700 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

And this is only fair. For the Lorentz family / Moreau

A title of information this fact 1009 days any visit to the PARENT despite the judgments of the Court of appeal of Versailles

Mr Lorentz Emeric and Mrs Moreau Christel