Soutiens Des parents .S.E.F.C.A. Europe: The Lorentz non-never fold sou the nazi regime 40 it did not now that he will comply with crook of magistrate and of World War II S.S. social service

Hearing of the L... AND M

VIOLATION of CONTRADICTORY, the audiature and altera, the right to be heard is violated in any form of law

The formal admissibility under article 1031-1 and 1031-2 of the code of civil procedure and would be constructed.

Denial of justice under article 341-4 code of civil procedure and article 94 of the code therefore consists

ART. 61 - 1 of the French constitution 1 paragraph

Recall that when, on the occasion of a proceeding before a court, it is argued that a legislative provision infringes the rights and freedoms that the constitution guarantees, the Constitutional Council may be seized of this question on the reference of the Council of State or the cassation pronounced within a specified period.

6 Years now it's half that we fight to recover our children, who we have been violently uprooted, simply on allegations of social assistance to childhood. Whenever there is a hearing either before the juvenile judge at Nanterre or to the Court of appeal of Versailles, we present, and each time we have the right to insult by the judges. The last hearing we had with the judge of children of Nanterre, dates back to January 21, 2011, as Ms. Martine Novella children will judge that we seized the European Court of human rights, as well it has extended by two years the plight of the placement of our children, the worst is that in his judgment it has put : 'It appears from the file that Mr L and Ms. M are sick psychologically, not recognized by them, so they can not be followed medically. What is very strange, it is that the two psychiatric reports as we did in 2007, stipulate not we are sick psychologically, but we are quite able to take care of our children. Judge Mrs. Novella made us remove our daughter Amélie L at birth, for reasons very strange, that only Mrs M would have recognized her daughter, that Mr L. Had gestures and harmful behaviour toward her baby. It's really very weird, because our daughter is called Amelie L and non-Amélie M., and never AHS was behaviour or dangerous actions towards his daughter. Of course the judge has not called us to remove us our daughter, this is two years, that it us has been kidnapped by the social assistance to childhood and the juvenile judge.We do not know where our daughter, since the ASE de Suresnes never wanted to tell us. In the cloth that was handed to me by hand in the maternity ward, when I made the request, I am supposedly a right to visit once a month for one hour, and under supervision. It is two years that I could not exercise my right to visit since I don't know where my daughter, despite the many letters I could make to the ASE de Suresnes, the most serious is that these monstrous people of ESA made a declaration of abandonment at the level of the Nanterre JAF. Our last child Christian L born last year, us was also kidnapped in the maternity ward, without be heard by the juvenile judge, according to his clerk, the juvenile judge does not have to hear us to place our children. After several go - back to the TGI of Nanterre, we had 30/12/11, interim judgment concerning our son Christian, who we was delivered by hand, by a clerk of all times, when we have requested if there was not another judgment, she us certified that it was only that one. Off we received on the part of the ASE de Suresnes, an email stating that our son is taken in charge by ESA of the 92, following the judgment of the juvenile court judge, in November 2011. Of course, we have never had that said judgment, that either the judge of children, or the ASE de Suresnes, they address to write us, but they sent express to our old address, to then be able to make notes to the judge, saying that they cannot join the family L M.