eliminación de alerta que poco Fiona, 5 años, desapareció el domingo, 12 de mayo Levante la advertencia de secuestro por Fiona Petition de Nicolas de Saboulin France - Fiona poco, 5 años, desaparecida el domingo, 12 de mayo en un concurrido Parque de Clermont-Ferrand, no se encuentra. Mientras que una investigación judicial se abrió el martes por "secuestro y secuestro", Internet, redes sociales exigen una alerta de secuestro. Policía Clermont-Ferrand apeló a los testigos el lunes, pero el secuestro aparato sin embargo no ha sido activado. Abogado, una única autoridad que puede decidir el gatillo, ha justificado su decisión especificando que no hay por el momento "ninguna información encontrada en la existencia de un secuestro". Interrogado, el fiscal dijo: "Lamento no poder hacerlo". Pedir la activación de la alerta de secuestro!

Alarmieren Sie entfernen, dass wenig Fiona, 5 Jahre, Sonntag, 12 Mai verschwunden Erhöhen Sie die Entführung Warnung für Fiona Petition von Nicolas de Saboulin Frankreich - wenig Fiona, 5 Jahre, Sonntag, 12 Mai in einem belebten Park von Clermont-Ferrand, verschwand nicht gefunden werden kann. Während eine gerichtliche Untersuchung Dienstag "Entführung und Sequestrierung", eröffnet wurde Internet, soziale Netzwerke fordern eine Entführung-Warnung. Clermont-Ferrand Polizei appellierte an Zeugen Montag, aber die Entführung Warneinrichtung wurde jedoch nicht ausgelöst. Anwalt, nur eine Behörde, die den Trigger entscheiden kann, hat seine Wahl durch die Angabe, dass es nicht gerechtfertigt für den Augenblick "keine Information über das Bestehen einer Entführung". Befragt, sagte der Staatsanwalt: "Ich bedauere, nicht in der Lage, dies zu tun". Fragen Sie das Auslösen der Entführung-Warnung!

alert removal little Fiona, 5 years, disappeared Sunday, may 12

alert removal little Fiona, 5 years, disappeared Sunday, may 12 Raise the kidnap warning for Fiona Petition of Nicolas de Saboulin France - little Fiona, 5 years, disappeared Sunday, may 12 in a busy Park of Clermont-Ferrand, cannot be found. While a judicial investigation was opened Tuesday for "kidnapping and sequestration", Internet, social networks are demanding an abduction alert. Clermont-Ferrand police appealed to witnesses Monday, but the 'kidnap warning' device has however not been triggered. Attorney, only one authority that can decide the trigger, has justified his choice by specifying that there not for the moment "no information found on the existence of a kidnapping". Questioned, the Prosecutor said: "I regret not being able to do so". Ask the triggering of the kidnap warning!

alerte enlevement La petite Fiona, 5 ans, disparue dimanche 12 mai

Déclenchez l'alerte enlèvement pour Fiona Pétition de Nicolas de Saboulin France -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- La petite Fiona, 5 ans, disparue dimanche 12 mai dans un parc très fréquenté de Clermont-Ferrand, reste introuvable. Alors qu'une information judiciaire a été ouverte mardi pour "enlèvement et séquestration", sur internet, les réseaux sociaux réclament une alerte enlèvement. La police de Clermont-Ferrand a lancé un appel à témoins lundi, mais le dispositif "alerte enlèvement" n'a toutefois pas été déclenché. Le procureur, seul autorité pouvant décider du déclenchement, a justifié son choix en précisant qu'il n'y avait pas pour l'instant pas "d'information avérée sur l'existence d'un enlèvement". Interrogé, le procureur a répondu: "Je regrette de ne pas avoir pu le faire". Demandons le déclenchement de l'alerte enlèvement !

Elle était prof d’espagnol ; elle s’est suicidée…

Nathalie Filippi enseignait l’espagnol dans un collège de l’académie de Nice. C’est une tâche ingrate, que d’enseigner à des jeunes abreuvés de télévision et de jeux vidéo, mal encadrés par des parents dépassés. Difficile de transmettre un peu de savoir quand le modèle du moment s’appelle Nabilla. On le fait, par amour de la culture, par souci des ces jeunes qui nous sont confiés. Parfois, cela se passe moins bien que d’habitude. Parce qu’on est fatigué, que nous avons, comme d’autres, des problèmes personnels, que quelques élèves sont plus difficiles. C’est arrivé à Nathalie Filippi. La réponse de l’institution a été une demande d’inspection. C’est terrible à dire, mais tout professeur sait ce que cela signifie : ce genre d’inspection est destiné à remettre en cause l’enseignant. Ce n’est pas, le plus souvent, une aide mais le début d’une procédure inquisitoire. Dans l’Éducation nationale, aujourd’hui, la hiérarchie est l’ennemi du professeur. Nathalie ne l’a pas supporté, elle s’est suicidée le 8 mai. L’administration dira qu’il ne faut pas généraliser, que cette enseignante avait sans doute des problèmes, que l’Éducation nationale n’est pas responsable. Antienne habituelle de France Télécom à la Police nationale. Sauf que la FGAF (Fédération générale autonome de la fonction publique) a publié un Livre blanc de la souffrance au travail dans lequel l’Éducation nationale apparaît bien souvent. Sauf que la dépression fait des ravages dans les rangs des professeurs. Que la moitié d’entre eux envisagent de quitter le métier. Qu’il n’y a plus grand monde qui veuille devenir enseignant (certains concours de recrutement proposent plus de postes que de candidats !). Face à cette situation, le ministère se tait. Il ne fait rien. Pas de médecine du travail, pourtant prévue par la loi. Aucun soutien. Pas de postes adaptés. Mais toujours plus de réunions, de programmes infaisables, de papiers à remplir, de pressions pour améliorer les notes, de mépris affiché pour les enseignants. Nathalie Filippi laisse une famille éplorée. Comme Lise Bonnafous il y a plus d’un an. Comme d’autres dont on n’entend pas parler. L’enseignement meurt en silence : ni fleurs ni couronnes. Pierre Van Ommeslaeghe, le 14 mai 2013

Petition Prosecute the politicians responsible for the Secret Family Courts

Prosecute the politicians responsible for the Secret Family Courts Petition by John Malloch-Caldwell St Leonards, United Kingdom http://www.change.org/petitions/prosecute-the-politicians-responsible-for-the-secret-family-courts -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In a Free and Democratic Society, Justice must never be dispensed in Secret (closed) Courts. Justice must rely on the application of factual evidence before open and honest tribunals. In a Free and Democratic Society all those persons standing accused before a Court of Justice must be formally charged with a recognised crime. The children of those persons standing before a Court of Justice accused of no crime should never be considered for adoption by any Government or State without the express permission of their birth parents. All evidence presented to Courts of Justice must be subject to rules of Perjury and that all persons giving false evidence must be subject to those rules. All those persons standing before a Court of Justice in a Free and Democratic Society must be subject to the identical rules of Justice as covers all criminal proceedings without interference from Government or Government appointed Ministers. Therefore we the undersigned place before this International Criminal Court of Justice a complaint and allegation of Crimes against Humanity. This complaint is that those individuals listed below are responsible for the abuse of their position within the Government of the United Kingdom and in past Government of the United Kingdom in that they knowingly supported a system of persecution against children and their parent/s by allowing a system of forced adoption of children to be conducted against the parent’s wishes in contravention of the aim of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights under Article 5 - No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. That the accused knowingly allowed local government officials to act detrimentally to the freedom, structure and wellbeing of families by placing parents for trial before secret (closed) courts without formal criminal charge of any recognised criminal act against the Declaration of Human Rights Article 7 - All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination. That the accused knowingly allowed perjury, the lack of factual evidence and the absence of a jury and restricted freedom of the press to identify the perpetrators of Crimes against Humanity by way of holding a system of secret (closed) courts against The Declaration of Human Rights Article 7 - All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination. That the accused knowingly allowed these actions to continue in a way that restricted the right of the individuals brought before the secret (closed) courts access to open and honest justice and without formal criminal charge in contravention of The Declaration of Human Rights Article 7 - All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination. That the accused knowingly placed individuals before secret (closed) courts without criminal charge to be denied the rights given to those subject to criminal charge enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights under Article 10 of the Declaration that - Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him. That the accused knowingly violated the Universal Declaration of Human Rights under Article 30 by allowing performance of acts by secret (closed) courts that destroyed and denied the Rights and Freedoms of those persons placed before the secret (closed) courts without criminal charge as set forth and enshrined in the Universal Declaration of the Human Rights to which the United Kingdom is a signatory That in addition the accused knowingly placed the individuals before these secret (closed) courts to be denied those rights as may be applicable and enshrined in the European Human Rights Act 1998 to which the United Kingdom Government is a signatory. Signed - The following are hereby accused of the Crimes Against Humanity as stated above. The Right Hon Mr. David Cameron MP – Prime Minister, First Lord of the Treasury and Minister for the Civil Service of the United Kingdom. The Right Hon Mr Nick Glegg MP – Deputy Prime Minister, Lord President of the Council of the United Kingdom. The Right Hon Mr Kenneth Clark MP– Lord Chancellor, Secretary of State for Justice. The Right Hon Mr Michel Gove MP – Secretary of State for Education Mr Tony Blair – Former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom To: International Criminal Court I just signed the following petition addressed to: International Criminal Court. ---------------- Prosecute Crimes Against Humanity In a Free and Democratic Society, Justice must never be dispensed in Secret (closed) Courts. Justice must rely on the application of factual evidence before open and honest tribunals. In a Free and Democratic Society all those persons standing accused before a Court of Justice must be formally charged with a recognised crime. The children of those persons standing before a Court of Justice accused of no crime should never be considered for adoption by any Government or State without the express permission of their birth parents. All evidence presented to Courts of Justice must be subject to rules of Perjury and that all persons giving false evidence must be subject to those rules. All those persons standing before a Court of Justice in a Free and Democratic Society must be subject to the identical rules of Justice as covers all criminal proceedings without interference from Government or Government appointed Ministers ---------- Therefore we the undersigned place before this International Criminal Court of Justice a complaint and allegation of Crimes against Humanity.---------- This complaint is that those individuals listed below are responsible for the abuse of their position within the Government of the United Kingdom and in past Government of the United Kingdom in that they knowingly supported a system of persecution against children and their parent/s by allowing a system of forced adoption of children to be conducted against the parent’s wishes in contravention of the aim of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights under Article 5 - No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.---------- That the accused knowingly allowed local government officials to act detrimentally to the freedom, structure and wellbeing of families by placing parents for trial before secret (closed) courts without formal criminal charge of any recognised criminal act against the Declaration of Human Rights Article 7 - All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.---------- That the accused knowingly allowed perjury, the lack of factual evidence and the absence of a jury and restricted freedom of the press to identify the perpetrators of Crimes against Humanity by way of holding a system of secret (closed) courts against The Declaration of Human Rights Article 7.---------- That the accused knowingly allowed these actions to continue in a way that restricted the right of the individuals brought before the secret (closed) courts access to open and honest justice and without formal criminal charge in contravention of The Declaration of Human Rights Article 7.---------- That the accused knowingly placed individuals before secret (closed) courts without criminal charge to be denied the rights given to those subject to criminal charge enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights under Article 10 of the Declaration that - Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him.---------- That the accused knowingly violated the Universal Declaration of Human Rights under Article 30 by allowing performance of acts by secret (closed) courts that destroyed and denied the Rights and Freedoms of those persons placed before the secret (closed) courts without criminal charge as set forth and enshrined in the Universal Declaration of the Human Rights to which the United Kingdom is a signatory.---------- That in addition the accused knowingly placed the individuals before these secret (closed) courts to be denied those rights as may be applicable and enshrined in the European Human Rights Act 1998 to which the United Kingdom Government is a signatory.---------- Signed ---------- The following are hereby accused of the Crimes Against Humanity as stated above.---------- The Right Hon Mr. David Cameron MP – Prime Minister, First Lord of the Treasury and Minister for the Civil Service of the United Kingdom.----------- The Right Hon Mr Nick Glegg MP – Deputy Prime Minister, Lord President of the Council of the United Kingdom.------------ The Right Hon Mr Kenneth Clark MP– Lord Chancellor, Secretary of State for Justice. The Right Hon Mr Michel Gove MP – Secretary of State for Education.---------- Mr Tony Blair – Former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom ---------------- Sincerely, Sincerely, [Your name]

bonne fete a tous