My nightmare a mother testifies

My nightmare a mother testifies

This is my nightmare, it happens in RENNES. Fiction? Reality? And if you were the next?...

I left the father of my son in 2007, I blamed him its violence and its perversity.

In 2009, I redo my life with my partner, my son and his two children who live with us and form a close-knit siblings. A situation that will be knowingly ignored by social services.

I take justice in 2008 following the revelations of my 4 year old on the violence of his father son.

A social investigation is so ordered. The investigator considers fit to care for her child father and considers incapable of violence despite evidence the overwhelming. It makes me so severely in question and let me guard... While "inviting me" psychiatric follow-up. Shot, I do not ask of second opinion. Serious error...

If connected then the measures ordered by the juvenile court judge:

First a measure investigative and educational guidance (HWI) for judging our family, and the father, as well as the conditions of life and education of children. The father recognize then its violence it attributes to a painful childhood and marked by serious relationship problems with her mother. He suffers from traumatic amnesia. This report will be duly ignored later...

Then comes the education in an open environment (AEMO), heaviest action in circumstances where educators consider the child in danger. In our case the teacher is aware of the serious shortcomings of paternal and leased the education that I give to my son! A record proves...

My companion and I inform stakeholders of the disturbing behaviour of my son to return with his father (hygiene, drawings, sexualized acts and words, violence, sexual assault, encopresis, enuresis, nocturnal terrors...), the testimonies are numerous.

Against these detailed elements, 'protection of children' services operate no reporting! Worse, I am accused of psychologically damaging my son seeking to prove they have suffered. It is question that my "feelings" and "parental conflict"...

I complaint following a return of my son with bruises on the back and buttocks and "words stuck in her body." I combined and assumes non-presentations.

My son is transformed, it is being rebuilt.

My complaint supported by particularly serious items will be ordered in a month.

Yet...

Psychological expertise established that my son is with his father to pornography and the denigration of her mother.

The AEMO service is informed, takes it very badly and threatens to place my son...

Furious with this expertise, it commissioned its own expert is the case to say since it was the husband of the social investigator!

The Family Affairs Judge rejects responsibility for access on the juvenile judge and ordered a psychiatric expertise.

A behavioral analysis of my son will be carried out by a renowned speaker, even more serious suspicions are issued on my piece of cabbage would have suffered.

Meanwhile, the first experts has made a report to the Prosecutor's Office, which seized and then class after the hearing before the juvenile court judge. The folder appears have been conveniently empty of anything in my favour. It should be noted that I had, during this hearing, meant saving the "educator" by the AEMO, the latter did not hesitate to lie deliberately to this same judge.

The juvenile judge then says my son to child welfare (ASE) but in a placement at our home. I keep my son, to charge for the ASE visits profile for his father.

Forensic psychiatry is issued a few days later and raises the danger, the father/son bond rupture and a medical assessment.

Very surprisingly the social worker and the psychologist show witnessed the few cases they intend to make this expertise. They tell me in a way that my son has become their "property". They have at their discretion and regularly leave my son alone with his father. An extension of rights is required on their part after 4 visits "Kinder-Lego...

The consultation of the administrative record shows the absence of very important parts.

The Family Affairs judge again denies its responsibility on the juvenile court judge. She suggested that the precautionary principle would be applied insofar as my son found his father in a secure framework set out by the juvenile judge.

She then ordered a new psychiatric expertise!

I learn that the folder between the criminal and juvenile court judge would have emptied of its most important elements.

As there was much against the father and my home would not allow my son to "free his word", ESA requested the placement of my son "in order to be able to observe it in neutral.

Here I am again accused without justification to my son seriously endangered. The reports expose unverifiable comments allegedly made by my son, the school, the mounted police, and myself. It portrays me monstrous to great fanfare of "psychological analysis" in contrast to the idyllic portrait of the poor dad. Very disturbing facts are deliberately omitted, others imagined.

I threatened to see me remove my son by ESA to be placed and that his father can see it more and more.

Solicited to bedroom writing their implied decision, social workers refuse to endorse any liability that could them be later alleged.

These same people put me the pressure so I brought them my son so that it is left to his father for several hours and that I accept their appreciation of the total absence of danger expertise (in front of witnesses) and "secure frame" ordered by the JAF.

ALL REPORTS APPEAR TO BE IGNORED OR LOST IN THE WILD...

But these gribouilles who decide for my son to have the quality, are they trained as psychologists to take on such responsibilities?

Not even.

I view just the lack of existence of these young people to the ADELI (file that lists among other psychologists) file. And they are not the only one of the previous speakers have done much damage...

Lien:http://comitecedif.WordPress.com/2012/08/23/Mon-cauchemar-une-mere-temoigne/